Share this project

Done

Share this project

Done
Hero-U is a turn-based PC RPG with adventure game puzzles and immersive story, by the award-winning designers of Quest for Glory.
Hero-U is a turn-based PC RPG with adventure game puzzles and immersive story, by the award-winning designers of Quest for Glory.
Hero-U is a turn-based PC RPG with adventure game puzzles and immersive story, by the award-winning designers of Quest for Glory.
6,093 backers pledged $409,150 to help bring this project to life.

Use this space to cheer the creator along, and talk to your fellow backers.

Have a question?

Only backers can post comments. Log In
    1. WP - Member, Mutant League on August 15

      For those interested, you can play Heroine's Quest for free in the meantime :p
      http://store.steampowered.com/app/283880/Heroines_Quest_The_Herald_of_Ragnarok/

    2. Justin
      Superbacker
      on August 14

      Danny, no news as of yet. At least, not here.

      "Look for another update by the end of June with detailed Alpha Test news and instructions."

      Looks like they completely flopped on it. Nothing on it at the end of June, nothing during July, nothing at the beginning of August, nothing here at the middle of August.

    3. Danny on August 14

      Has there been any news on Alpha Testing? Has it begun?

    4. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on August 11

      Lol. Alright, I'll stop feeding you. Have a nice day, and enjoy the game when it comes out.

    5. Justin
      Superbacker
      on August 11

      "Generally when people say liquor, they are referring to "hard" alcohol, not beer, but we digress."

      Another utterly wrong assumption/generalization on your part. Sorry, that's as far as I got. Your nonsense is just too much for me.

    6. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on August 11

      Generally when people say liquor, they are referring to "hard" alcohol, not beer, but we digress.

      You seem to be missing the point that my assumptions are no more wild than yours. There is no more reason to believe that the average backer prefers the original vision than there is reason to believe the average backer prefers the changed vision. We simply don't have the necessary data to make that judgement.

      My initial point was to simply express skepticism that a significant number of people could honestly think the original vision presented a quality aesthetic. A "good enough" aesthetic to put up with in order to get a game from the Coles, sure, but actual quality? It really did look like something you would buy for a dollar and play on your phone, whereas the revised vision actually looks like something that belongs on a PC.

    7. Justin
      Superbacker
      on August 10

      Zac, well, good thing you are free to make whatever wild assumptions you want regardless of how wrong they are. You stick with liquor? Beer is liquor so...what?

    8. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on August 10

      I'm pretty sure 99.98% is how many backers care more about it being a game from the Coles than about how fast it arrives or whether it is totally in line with the original vision. And I stick with liquor.

    9. Justin
      Superbacker
      on August 9

      Ok Zac...99.98%. Did you have that beer yet?

    10. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on August 9

      Actually, we don't know for a fact that every single backer would have been happy with the original concept. I am obviously a backer, and I wasn't remotely happy with the graphical presentation in the original concept. I just wanted more of the Coles' narrative design, and I was willing to accept the horrible, low-rent mobile game interface if that was all they could put together the funding to give us. As for timing, if my options are a terrible game fast or a great game slow, great is more important than fast. YMMV.

      I make it a rule to only give more than a few dollars to a project when I like the physical rewards from whichever tier I back to be okay with it if the product itself fails to deliver. If anything, I should be more irritated than others, since they decided not to deliver most of the physical stuff until the game boxes ship. But I'm not, because like I said, the destination being worthwhile is more important than how long we spend on the trip.

      And they still have games on consoles? I thought consoles were for streaming videos and playing blu-rays...

    11. Claus Bo Christensen
      Superbacker
      on August 5

      @Linda. I agree with you somewhat, but I'm actually happy they changed the looks of the game. I'm in the same boat as you with leisure time. But I somehow manage to take time and do the things I want to do.
      It's like keeping that book you really want to read on the nightstand and then finally pick it up and start reading it. I honestly don't mind having something to look forward to, even if it means that it is weeks, months or years ahead.
      Quest for Glory 1-5 fan and I did indeed enjoy number 5. It felt like closure. I admire the Coles that they've kept on going. It cannot have been easy.

    12. Linda Evans on August 2

      We know for a fact that every single backer would have been happy with the original concept after all that is when we opened our wallet.

      I'm more skeptical of the claim that everyone likes the increased scope and the longer waiting times. I think a lot of people just gave up on the game.

      I certainly would have preferred what I was promised years ago over this eternal wait. Mid June was the last update that they were moving towards Alpha.

      I backed this when I still did a lot of gaming on PC before the birth of my son and before taking a more intensive job. I do most of my gaming on consoles now and at this point I'm not even sure I will put much time into the game if it ever releases.

    13. Justin
      Superbacker
      on August 1

      It's all going to be ok Zac. Go have a beer and enjoy today.

    14. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on July 31

      What inquiry? I wasn't asking a question, I was expressing skepticism. A handful of people in a comment thread is not sufficient evidence to make me believe that a substantial percentage of the game's thousands of backers were motivated more by really loving the mock-ups of game screens that looked like they belonged on a tablet than by QfG nostalgia and confidence in the Coles. As for "four years late," so what? I don't know if you noticed, but pretty much every adventure game project on Kickstarter gave estimates that turned out to be wildly off base. Hero U probably won't even end up being the one that takes the longest, but it very easily could end up being the one that is most worth the wait.

    15. Jinx on July 26

      Won't be long now until the final "final home stretch" kickstarter to get this into beta. Just a few more months. Just you wait.

    16. Justin
      Superbacker
      on July 25

      Cool story but none of that has anything to do with the reality of the project or your initial inquiry into why people backed. Like I said, read the comments and find the discussions. You are literally arguing why people backed based on future visuals that weren't available at the time. Utterly pointless and ultimately none of it has to do with the project being 4 years late because of said change.

    17. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on July 25

      Let's be fair though; the 3D in QfG5 wasn't horrible because 3D is inherently bad, it was horrible because the technology at the time simply wasn't ready yet. It's a mature technology at this point, and the only reason to categorically reject the third dimension in 2017 is blind nostalgia.

      Also, 5 was not a garbage game, it was a good game with garbage graphics. Which, if we're taking off the rose-colored nostalgia glasses, would also be true of the first two games. The only ones in the series where the technology was available (and well utilized) to create a quality aesthetic were III and IV.

      Would I prefer a higher quality QfG III/IV style of graphics to what we are getting? Of course I would. But that was never one of the options presented in this project. Whether you prefer 3D or 2D on a conceptual level, the 3D we are getting looks like it has a substantially higher quality of implementation that the particular type of 2D the project originally sold us on.

    18. Justin
      Superbacker
      on July 21

      No need to be skeptical. It's rather simple. People loved QFG1-4. QFG5 was garbage. The average person that disliked it, did so because of the horrible 3D direction they took. They were glad to have another story but struggled through the horrible representation. It's very safe to say that many people here were looking forward to them getting back to something more simplistic. So yes, the tile aspect was in fact a key decision making feature. Just read through the comments and you'll find lots of discussion about it. Sometimes people don't want C.O.D., they want a side scrolling Mario

      But now we've crossed the line into arguing about people's opinion, which is a major waste of time.

    19. Zac Green-Legitimate Businessman, AGL589 on July 20

      I'm skeptical that anyone could look at the mock-ups of what the actual game screen would look like from the original campaign and honestly believe that looks like a superior visual experience as compared to the revised direction.

      The original campaign's success was, in my opinion, due almost entirely to trust in the Coles based on QfG nostalgia. It likely had nothing, or next to to nothing, to do with a deep love for the presented design process or the tile system. The only real problem with the new direction they took is that they didn't start with it, and that's not really a problem they could address without a flux capacitor. I'd much rather have a (potentially) great game to play that takes five years to hit alpha than a forgettable diversion that is churned out in one or two. We get plenty of that already from the corporate gaming industry.

    20. Benjamin Penney on July 14

      I still have faith that the Coles will deliver! I know that if I were making a game for thousands of backers, I would love to see some positivity on the comments wall. So, go Coles! The release is in sight! (I hope.)

    21. Missing avatar

      Malik on July 11

      Exactly. I never asked for changing the design, which in turn prompted a second kickstarter. I supported the Coles' original game design. It was a humble 2D design, but I was only too happy to support them that time. I paid whatever I can then. It may not break your bank, but for some of us, even the basic tier is a substantial amount.

    22. Justin
      Superbacker
      on July 5

      "the Coles have mortgaged their house to bring this game out"

      Yeah, because they didn't stick to the original plan and changed it into something they had zero experience in. No tears here. That was a horrible choice. They should have stuck to the original plan. Now we're all getting something we didn't even back. That might be ok for you but it's not for many of us. Now we sit, wait and see what they dump in our laps. Good? Bad? I guess we'll find out, some day.

    23. Missing avatar

      James Paten on June 30

      @Pedasn That's fair, but I'll have optimism regardless. A few dollars spent five years ago isn't breaking my bank but the Coles have mortgaged their house to bring this game out... who do you think has more invested in this game coming out and it being good?

    24. Pedasn on June 28

      @ James Paten: So far, we have only their word that the game will be good, polished and deep. I don't think their word is worth a lot by now. Even if it comes out, it could still end up being an empty mess.

    25. Justin
      Superbacker
      on June 26

      Malik, same here. I still have all my maxed out characters including Paladin. I played the heck out of those games. But this will be on the bottom of my list. I'll probably play SpaceVenture before this....even if it comes out years later.

    26. Missing avatar

      Malik on June 24

      And this is coming from a veteran Quest for Glory player. I'm not some newbie who decided to support this as a random gaming interest.

      I was there when QFG was released as Hero's Quest in EGA and I first played it in my 286.

      I supported this game solely based on the names of Coles. And since this, I never supported another kickstarter ever, looking at how even legendary names fail to keep up the release.

    27. Missing avatar

      Malik on June 24

      It's not even in Beta yet. I fail to see how some are still even excited over this project.

      With a change of design from original proposal to backers, and almost un-ending delays of release and postponements, and still an unclear completion status, it's more frustrating than exciting.

    28. Mike K on June 22

      "We will be out in far less time than Duke Nukem Forever..."

      I should hope so. DNF was originally announced in 1997 and wasn't released until 2011.

      Seriously, saying you'll be done before a game notorious for being in "development hell" and took 14 years to see the light of day doesn't exactly fill me with a lot of confidence (or hope).

    29. Missing avatar

      James Paten on April 23, 2017

      Just gotta say... still very excited for this project!

      I've waited almost two decades for a new QFG game... to see it come so close is a dream come true! It's great to see you all take your time and make sure the game is what you want it to be, not something that was only as good as the project plan timeline allowed.

    30. Jinx on April 5, 2017

      "On request, I will also provide keys to other sites - likely steam, humble, and gog - to backers"

      I would hope so. Us backers aren't just wanting the game through your site. We will want it on either steam or gog, to be sure. I think that goes without saying.

    31. Corey Cole 2-time creator on March 29, 2017

      I plan to use a web-based bug-reporting database. I think that will be easier to handle than an Excel sheet, given that we'll have dozens (or more) of testers in all sorts of areas at once.

    32. Missing avatar

      Nicholas Ford on March 28, 2017

      Exciting update! Thanks for sharing! A quick suggestion for Alpha and Beta testing: if you create an excel spreadsheet for reporting bugs, comments, and features (with pre-filled column headings, e.g., "Date", "Time", "Location", and "Issue") it will make your bug squashing much easier. You could even have dialogue ID numbers displayed in the game for testers, to really help narrow things down. Best of luck!

    33. Corey Cole 2-time creator on March 28, 2017

      @Jeremy: New update is up. It takes me a week or two to write and illustrate an update, so it's hard for me to post them much more often. This one has specifics on our planned test release dates.

    34. Missing avatar

      Duncan Teed on March 15, 2017

      Looking forward to it whenever it comes. I'm just glad the Coles are making another game, big thanks to them and all the team!!

    35. Jeremy The Jinx on March 15, 2017

      Any new updates on the project, trying to be patient and let the updates speak for themselves but haven't seen much in terms of updates recentally

    36. Missing avatar

      Flump - the flying turtle on February 16, 2017

      ok thanks. fine if it is a few months after release; as long as the option exist.

    37. Corey Cole 2-time creator on February 16, 2017

      Flump: All backers are on BackerKit (including ones from our web site, which I've had to add to BackerKit one at a time), which makes it easy to get digital downloads there. On request, I will also provide keys on other sites - likely Steam, Humble, and GoG - to backers. I'm not spending any time working out those details until after the game is in Beta.

    38. Missing avatar

      Flump - the flying turtle on February 15, 2017

      Are you saying we won't be getting a gog key but rather have to use a different site for download ?

    39. Sean on February 8, 2017

      I think we're way past the point of sticking to deadlines...

    40. Missing avatar

      James Paten on February 8, 2017

      So I don't suppose this comment from two updates ago is still valid, is it?

      "I’m shooting for 'feature complete' and alpha testing in January, with Beta testing in February or early March and release 2nd quarter 2017. It’s been a long, stressful journey, but the end is in sight."

    41. Justin
      Superbacker
      on February 6, 2017

      LOL! That's the kindest way I've ever heard someone telling people to shut up.

    42. Skyleaf on February 1, 2017

      Let's return to silence until the next update shall we? Everything that needs to be said has been said. Everyone can read all the opinions posted here, and there is no delete button.

    43. Justin
      Superbacker
      on February 1, 2017

      "I don't understand this anger."

      Then I don't understand your comment. All I see are people expressing they are upset.

      anger
      call for their heads
      heated angst
      handwringing (seriously?)
      personal attacks

      What on Earth are you talking about?

    44. Missing avatar

      SXF on February 1, 2017

      I neither said nor implied that. I already acknowledged that this project has had multiple severe management issues over its entire lifetime, starting with changing the scope almost as soon as it was funded because some people didn't seem to know what they were backing. I 100% agree with taking the developers to task for these failures. What I don't find worthwhile or reasonable is some of the more heated angst, handwringing, and personal attacks. These, I feel, are just a bit out of proportion to the actual situation.

      All I'm saying is, let's keep things in perspective. If you feel that you already have things in perspective, well, carry on. I'm not going to argue about it.

    45. Justin
      Superbacker
      on January 31, 2017

      SXF, read ALL the comments here and ALL the comments for every update. It's pretty blatantly clear why people are upset and it has little do with the project being late.

    46. Skyleaf on January 30, 2017

      This is nothing. I was trying to gauge the hype for InXile's Tides of Numenera since they've released an official release date. So I go to their KS comment section and surprisingly, it is highly toxic. Kickstarter can really be cruel sometimes.

      I'm actually a little glad that the Coles didn't have to deal with that kind of animosity. They don't deserve it. They're throwing F bombs left and right in that place.

    47. Missing avatar

      SXF on January 28, 2017

      I don't understand this anger. Yes, there have been serious issues getting this thing done and delivered, starting pretty much the minute the Kickstarter ended, but the team is communicating in good faith and the project is pretty clearly still moving. It is what it is. I don't see any need to call for their heads.

      I backed Worlds of Magic. Compared to the blatant disregard and lack of respect from the team behind that heinous aborted disaster, waiting for the Coles to dig themselves out doesn't even rate for me.

    48. Jinx on January 22, 2017

      @Gamehoarder, I think we're sadly way past the point of potential refunds for a broken promise. I wish we could, as I would happily take my money and put those money into another project, but I just can't see it happening.

      I also doubt we'll get the game in 2017.

    49. GAMEHORDER
      Superbacker
      on January 13, 2017

      I backed this at 250 ... Along with Space Venture ... Another 250 and still waiting. I also still own physical copies of almost every Sierra game made ... In other words Huge Fan, like many here . With that said , I'd like the game this year ... Or a refund

    50. Justin
      Superbacker
      on January 3, 2017

      This is probably a stepping stone at this point. Once this game is done and shipped then they'll have the foundation for another game then another, that wouldn't take as long.

Show older comments