Share this project

Done

Share this project

Done
Idea generation cards for Sci-fi roleplaying game masters. Draw endless ideas on the spot. System Neutral results for any sci-fi TTRPG.
Idea generation cards for Sci-fi roleplaying game masters. Draw endless ideas on the spot. System Neutral results for any sci-fi TTRPG.
470 backers pledged €15,380 to help bring this project to life.
It's a secret!, Materialgod, and 5 more people like this update.

Comments

Only backers can post comments. Log In
    1. LoreSmyth 7-time creator on

      Based on your feedback I decided on variation A. It seems the majority favorite. Sweet!

    2. Matthew Stark
      Superbacker
      on

      I prefer card A as that will make it better suited to using with any system when there aren't any mechanics added.

    3. Lee Paxton on

      A sparks a lot of possibilities in my mind, leaning towards that one

    4. LoreSmyth 7-time creator on

      Hell(o) everyone :) gosh that typo haha

      Thanks for all the great feedback, It seems A is the winner in this case, so we will move forward with that. We can explore other avenues in the future. Exciting times!

      regards!

      Chris

    5. Heewon on

      A is much nicer from a story telling point of view while b is much mechanic. I prefer A

    6. Trip Space-Parasite
      Superbacker
      on

      Definitely A. The mechanical stuff is not something I would need any help coming up with during play, and it's not useful during planning.

    7. Richard Osterhout
      Superbacker
      on

      definitely A - as some have said, B is game dependent. the other nice thing about deck A is that as GM, the "gotcha" is completely optional. for example, in the mockup, it could be just "Biology Expert + Needs Protection" and leave it at that - the "Spies steal the blueprints" could be optional.
      some of the cards COULD be like option B, but they should not have the damage or anything similar numeric/game specific values, or it should be graded, such as Low/Light, Moderate/Average, or High/Heavy damage, and let the GM decide how much that would be depending on game rules. i would even keep the damage type (i.e. the cryofreeze damage) generic, as the campaign may not have such technology/devices, and the GM could therefore pick whether it is a bio/chem attack, psionic attack, special ability, or just regular weapon.

      really, i'd prefer these be just events with cause/situation and effect for more options, including the "twist". i have a much more fleshed out deck for NPCs from another KS, and it seems like having a separate deck for NPCs would allow more options on both cards.

    8. Missing avatar

      Hector Heaviside
      Superbacker
      on

      Variation A - Key elements for me are sci-fi system neutral settings and minor (or maybe major!) story inspiration seeds used prior to or during gaming sessions. I'm really diggin' - "the last two seeds are "But..." or "But then..." scenarios that offer a twist". Very cool.

    9. underAtack
      Superbacker
      on

      To be perfectly honest, I like both; but as has been said, many of us are looking to these decks for storytelling flavor. However, it may just be me, but I'd be okay with a majority of A with a few B sprinkled in - that way, if I'm mid-game and pull a random encounter that has an attack statistic, I can have, like, 2 to 4 previously generated stat blocks ready to serve as that NPC...

    10. Keith Johnson
      Superbacker
      on

      I prefer Version A because it isn’t tied to game mechanics, meaning the deck is
      more useful to me as I can use it for a variety of completely different game systems.

    11. Missing avatar

      Justin Kelley on

      Variation A is definitely better. I would really prefer to have 4 character attributes no matter what though. It would be nice if there was a way to have 4 attributes AND these as well, probably won’t work though...

    12. Missing avatar

      Andrew Herring
      Superbacker
      on

      I would go with A; more story ideas every time. Even if I use it at the table, I can come up with mechanical twists and logical progressions much more easily that story ones.

    13. Missing avatar

      Materialgod
      Superbacker
      on

      Both cards are interesting. Depending of the Rulesystem B can be a good help. But probably would be Version A easier. But I like both.

    14. Missing avatar

      Roger Cawte
      Superbacker
      on

      I would prefer A myself.

    15. Missing avatar

      Thomas on

      I’d prefer variation A, as the second option would probably initiate combat and you’d need to develop more stats if they start to attack the card character, which would be hard if your using the cards on the fly for flavour

    16. Missing avatar

      Kelly Griffin on

      I personally would like variation A just because I plan of using the deck to help me with game prep and not something I would use at the table. Coming up with a cool story framework before a session is the hardest thing for me personally so variation A would be the biggest help in that respect.

      I could see where variation B would be super useful for those moments when you need some help improvising something on the fly/mid combat. But that's not my preference