Extrasolar: Season 2 — be a part of the story project video thumbnail
Replay with sound
Play with
$23,485 pledged of $85,000 goal
By Lazy 8 Studios
$23,485 pledged of $85,000 goal

Recent updates


485f190029c5a82e022adf6a8803b971 original
64fedde11663f01c8b4df175d2674606 original
Aee3b6ad78f882a1f5a91ee10c1e6efe original
33f557fd22ab948cab53d8de04ea0589 original
8d9ed0a3be16147a5b071b699ee0d4a6 original
D81e361d64d0afeda38d55a16ce41eca original
406f4ab991a63011bcf6debda8fa821b original
16a0ef20de591bc8ea05547318198b3a original
25828ff063d83883c96db2655c6b5f32 original
E1ab3eed44b56b45e58ea8beb743f48e original
02cc83038792abb6bb67c26eb039f39d original
48b42ddbf0951ba773dc61d3662b548d original

The Kickstarter is over, but Extrasolar lives on


We may not have hit our goal, but we've built a community!

There are still plenty of ways you can still support us. If you've been waiting to see how the Kickstarter turns out before you upgrade your account, then now is the time to upgrade.

Here are some of the links that were mentioned in the video.

Thanks to all our backers. Dream to worlds beyond!

28 Hours to Go!


Back when I used to run track, I remember the coach telling runners to never let up before the finish line. It doesn’t matter if you’re in first place or last. It’s about you, giving it your all and seeing it through to completion.  

A Kickstarter isn’t just about raising money. It’s also about building a community. So keep sharing with your friends. Keep bringing in those $1 pledges. We’ll do everything we can to make this project a reality. Even if we don’t hit our pledge goal, it’s you -- our generous backers -- who form the heart of the community that will help take Extrasolar to the next level.

Kickstarters to Watch

Game Loading: Rise of the Indies is a feature documentary exploring the world of indie game developers and how they have forever changed the landscape of games culture. The film is a discovery of the craft, culture and people behind these innovative and personal games.

Ethical Games: 254 Shades of Grey


I’ve been putting off this topic for a while now. It’s a complicated beast that’s hard to address objectively. It’s not at all black and white. And while it may, from the surface, seem like this is only an issue that matters to game designers, I hope that you’ll stick with me as I get to why it’s important for anyone downloading a game -- especially if it’s free -- to first consider whether the game’s business model is ethical. If the long scrollbar looks daunting, then skip ahead to the “Why it matters” section.

Black, white, and everything else

Free-to-play games are more common than ever, but there are still plenty of premium games out there -- games that you pay for once and get all the content forever. These sorts of games usually fall comfortably into the ethical category (#ffffff), designed and released with no controversy. On the other end of the spectrum (#000000), there’s that time when King.com trademarked the word “candy” and then sued CandySwipe, the very game that they heavily copied when making Candy Crush Saga (the issue was eventually resolved amicably, which likely means that a lot of money was exchanged).

Between these two extremes are downloadable content, pay-to-win games, and other microtransaction games that have successfully extracted tens of thousands of dollars from some vulnerable players. This expansive ethical minefield spans all the way from #010101 to #fefefe -- 254 shades of grey.

Legal vs. ethical

I want to carefully distinguish between these two words because, in a controversy, it’s common for a studio that finds itself in an ethical grey area to defend its behavior as 100% legal -- and they’re probably right. There are plenty of things that are legal but unethical -- like a lot of the shenanigans that caused the collapse of the housing market in 2008. On the flip side, there are some behaviors that are considered ethical but illegal. Most Americans will support a terminally ill patient who self-medicates with marijuana, even though it’s illegal in most states.

I make this distinction between legal and ethical because I want to make it clear that most of what we find in the ethical grey area is currently legal and is likely to stay that way. We can’t rely on our legal system to make ethical decisions for us.

The grey area

More often than not, it’s games with in-app purchases that find themselves somewhere in the grey area. The writers over at Extra Credits made a great video on why many free-to-play games, as currently implemented, are badly broken. They focus primarily on how the current model is unsustainable from a business perspective, simultaneously driving away players while driving up advertising costs. I want to focus more on the ethics of these games.

Most players are savvy enough to understand that when we download a “free” game, it’s probably not really free -- it’ll tempt us with microtransactions that let us play longer, level up faster, or look cooler. Chances are that you’ve never paid anything for those kinds of games, so you may wonder where the money to support those games comes from. What you may not know is that for these kinds of games, half of the revenue comes from just 0.15% of the players! Put another way, if you have 666 players who have downloaded your game, the game is making most of its money from just one of them. Game studios lovingly refer to these high-rolling players as whales.

Generally speaking, these sorts of games prey on people with addictive personalities. I doubt that the designers are evil people, deliberately out to find these sorts of victims and part them from their money. These games are made by perfectly well-intentioned folks who use algorithms to figure out what makes the most money. Every sound, every reward, every timer is perfectly tuned to maximize profits. It’s an amoral design process that just happens, as a byproduct, to make most of its money from a very small group of individuals.

Are those people victims? Maybe, maybe not. I suspect that many of them are fully aware that they’ve spent tens of thousands of dollars on games. Some have the means to do that. And most will probably say that they’re happy with their purchase (cognitive dissonance is likely to figure into their response). But any time a game is designed for addiction and allows players to drop an unlimited amount of money, its ethics should be considered questionable. This is exactly the reason why gambling is illegal or regulated in most places.

Breaking implicit promises

It used to be that if you bought a game, you could reasonably assume that all of that game’s content would be included. Somewhere along the way, downloadable content (DLC) became a way for studios to offer a little extra for their hard core fans. Today, DLC abuse has spiraled out of control. For instance, consider Train Simulator, available for $39.99 on Steam. Not cheap, right? So you get everything, right? Not even close. If you were to buy all of the DLC for Train Simulator, it would cost you more than $2800!

Economic realities

Do the ethics of a game’s financial model matter from an economic standpoint? Only if players make their purchase with ethics in mind. As it stands, microtransactions games currently reign as the clear financial winner. In the US, 79% of app store revenue comes from microtransactions -- a number that’s likely to climb. In China and Japan, that number is 94%! For all of these games in the ethical grey area, it’s hard to fault the creators. Games are a cutthroat business. If you want your studio to survive, you need to go where the money is. If there is a niche that hasn’t yet been exploited, it will be, so you might as well be the one to get there first. That’s the nature of Capitalism. Just like metrics-based game design, Capitalism is amoral. If money can be legally made on the backs of victims, a product will rise to fill the niche.

Where is Extrasolar?

Part of the reason this topic is particularly relevant to Extrasolar is that we considered several options for our game economy. We could have used microtransactions where you pay a small amount every time you want to take a panorama photo or shorten your time delay. But instead, we chose to sell the game as episodic content -- a model where if you pay $25, you’ll get everything we ever release.

A lot of successful game designers have told us this was a mistake -- that we should have at least one item in the game that can be purchased ad infinitum -- some way to take advantage of our whales. From a purely economic standpoint, they might be right: not choosing microtransactions may have been a mistake. It may end up dooming our beautiful, award-winning game. But to us, this decision was a moral one and we wanted to at least try to make the game financially viable with the economic model that we consider to be most ethical.

Why it matters

If there’s just one thing that I want you to take away from this article, it’s the understanding that games won’t get more ethical on their own. It’s up to you, the people who play games, to shape the economy. Your choices matter -- a lot! As long as people keep playing Candy Crush Saga while decrying premium games as too costly, freemium games will continue to reign supreme and more creative games -- games that are costly to produce and require experimentation -- will be stifled.

This isn’t just true for games. Every purchase we make has ethical consequences. Most grocery stores now have a vast array of eggs ranging anywhere from $1.50 to $7.00 per dozen. Depending on your choice, you may be supporting cage-free, free-range, antibiotic-free, hormone-free, organic, non-GMO, or locally produced -- it’s overwhelming! Everyone’s price-to-responsibility threshold will be different. What’s important is that we simply take the time to understand the trade-offs and at least attempt to make a responsible decision.

In our global economy, it's more common than ever for our purchases to have far-reaching unintended consequences. Whenever you buy something that seems too cheap to be true, it’s likely because of an externalized cost that’s hidden from you -- like unregulated pollution at the site where the product is manufactured. Freemium games are no different -- when you download a free app, you’re implicitly supporting its economic model, even if you never pay a dime. Every download counts as a vote that keeps the game at the top of the app store: in essence, free advertising. Somewhere down the line, in this huge collection of unsuspecting advertisers, lies the whale -- the externalized cost.

So how do you make responsible game choices? Do your research. Don’t be seduced by the free button. Read the game’s description to try to understand how it makes money. If it’s not clear, be suspicious. Ask the developer for clarification. Thankfully, both Google and Apple are moving toward more transparency. Google has already started labeling games that have in-app purchases.

Finally, and most importantly, if you see a game that you like or a game that is genuinely different or has a niche audience, support it! Even if you can’t pay, share the link with your friends. Always remember that players are more empowered than anyone else to make the game industry a more enjoyable, more ethical ecosystem.


Other Kickstarters to watch

Elegy for a Dead World
Elegy for a Dead World

Speaking of genuinely different games with a niche audience, I want to draw special attention to Elegy for a Dead World. Like Extrasolar, Elegy is experimenting with entirely new ways of telling a story -- in this case, asking the player to write the history of a civilization, pieced together from incomplete fragments.


Another great match for sci-fi fans, Flagship is a real-time strategy game where you command a fleet from the bridge of your own starship, exploring the stars and expanding your territory to save humanity from being wiped out in a hostile galaxy.

Designing for an alien world


Today's update is a guest piece from Extrasolar concept artist, Haley Friedmann.

When I first met up with Rob and Brendan to discuss Extrasolar and their vision for its wildlife, I got very, very excited. It became quickly apparent that we were all on the same nerdy page when it came to biology. It was important to all of us that while we wanted aliens that were strange and new, we also wanted them to make sense on a biological level.

I loved how they pushed me to make it weirder and weirder, while still discussing ideas of how these strange forms could be justified. Did science already have a hypothesis on how a form like this could work? Was there some obscure animal that already did something like this? How well did it work for them?

A clearfin lionfish. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
A clearfin lionfish. Source: commons.wikimedia.org

My best resources were the deep sea and the microscopic world. They assured my inspirations would be biologically sound while looking completely otherworldly. The smaller things get, the more beautifully delicate their structures become and the more unfamiliar they are. Same with the deeper the ocean goes. There are whole ecosystems living on sulfur or methane rather than oxygen, and many that thrive without sunlight as well.

I watched tons of nature documentaries and began to sketch and doodle shapes. The environment was a desert island, so creatures had to be able to deal with the heat, conserve food and water, and have strong defenses or be able to out-breed their predators.

Another direction I was given was the creatures had to look inviting. Rob wanted the players to be interested in the animal, but not scared off. I appreciated this choice and it was fun walking the fine line between the inspiring unknown and the disturbing unknown. That edge between wonder and apprehension. This doesn't mean every creature was beautiful, but I loved them all in their own funny ways.

For instance, the spade burrower is on the odder side of things. I was inspired by creatures who bury themselves in the sand and lie in wait for prey, like flat fish and trapdoor spiders. I was also inspired by animals whose mouths aren't necessarily on a "head," like sea stars. I like to think the mouth is best placed where ever it can catch the most food. Like many other creatures on Epsilon Eridani e, the spade burrower doesn't have very sophisticated eyesight. To catch food it waits until it can feel something running across the flesh pads surrounding the mouth, and then fast as lightning it traps the prey in its jaws. The small eyes that dot its head structure keep a lookout for large moving forms which it assumes to be predators. If one of these forms gets too close it vibrates to quickly unburrow itself and flee.

The rock mole is on the cuter side of things. Its two stalks carry bunches of light sensors, which act as its eyes. These precious organs are retractable kind of like a snail, and they tuck up under the shell while it burrows to get at plant roots with its beak. With the lower part of its body submerged, it fools predators into thinking it's just a worthless rock. It shuffles along in an adorable wiggle waggle as its shell plates contract and slide over each other on each side. Of all the creatures I designed I think this one would make the best pet.

It's been a blast working on this project and watching the animals (ahem, "motobionts") go from 2D to 3D. I wish I could tell you about all of them, but it's far more exciting for you to seek them out yourself in season 1. I hope people have as much fun discovering these aliens as we did creating them, and I can't wait for you to see the new ones coming in season 2! They're wild. Happy hunting, explorers.

You can find more of Haley's work, including more early Extrasolar concepts, on her website at http://haleyfriedmann.com/

New Reward Tiers: Fly Your Name in Space!

Season 2 is in the works
Season 2 is in the works

I’ve got great news to share! We've partnered with Enterprise in Space, an educational project of the non-profit National Space Society that's raising funds to launch an orbiter into space with 100+ student experiments -- a celebration of the enduring works of the great visionaries of science and science fiction.  

If you back us at our newly added $55 or $75 reward tiers, then we’ll arrange for your name to be included in the virtual crew manifest aboard the NSS Enterprise, which is currently slated for a 2019 launch and reentry.

At the $75 tier, we’ll sign you up for a one-year membership with the National Space Society (NSS), which includes a subscription to Ad Astra magazine.

Season 2 progress update  

Brendan’s been hard at work making beautiful new species and terrain for season 2 -- a whole new world to explore! He's been live streaming his work a couple times a week, so if you want to get a feel for how a game is made, go ahead and peek in to his Twitch channel. Keep an eye on the Lazy 8 Twitter feed to learn when he'll be broadcasting.

A screenshot of our editor as Brendan designs new species for season 2.
A screenshot of our editor as Brendan designs new species for season 2.
Season 2 will feature much denser vegetation.
Season 2 will feature much denser vegetation.
Editing the terrain and surface materials for season 2
Editing the terrain and surface materials for season 2

Mobile apps are on the way!

A prototype of a native app for phones and tablets.
A prototype of a native app for phones and tablets.

You asked for it, so we’re hard at work making it a reality! For the last couple of weeks, we’ve been working on a native app that will be available for phones and tablets. We’re targeting Android, iOS, and Windows Phone. It’s still going to take a while to work out all the bugs and create a mobile interface that feels as slick as our Web interface, but we’re well on our way.