Use this space to cheer the creator along, ask questions, and talk to your fellow backers. Please remember to be respectful and considerate. Thanks!
Before you sprain your shoulder patting yourselves on the back, 1000 units is approximately what percentage? If most people ordered 2 for the backup plan feature, it's about 4%...
Two years late
Half the features don't work yet
I want my money back - refund me now
If I stick a gun in somebodies face and steal 200 it's armed robbery.
If I lie, cheat and steal 1.2 million, it's Lima on Kickstarter...
What a clusterfain
@CGC: Vous ne communiquez pas la liste d'attente des expéditions à venir... Cela permettrait de se situer pourtant...
So.... how hackable is this hardware? I've long since moved on to other solutions where the original promise here isn't interesting. Will I be able to replace the firmware on the device with some general-purpose Linux distribution (unsupported, of course)?
@CGC where are refunds?
@Gerry, @Rex, @Daniel, @FS, @Plurial, @Christopher, @Tristan and everyone sharing their feedback and keeping the other backers informed on shipping: warm thanks from the team :)
@Christopher and @FS, the back up plan isn't currently supported by the app. But, we are working on it and testing it internally. We will let you know once it's ready.
@Brian and @KC, we have trouble understanding your comments. As per our records, you are not beta testers and you did not receive the device yet.
@Brian, we actually invited you to join the program in April but you never confirmed.
just realize i have backed this campaign for coming 2 years and havent receive the unit.....
Got my Lima today. Looks good, packaged well, and seems to work on my Mac. Waiting to get an invite to FlightTest the app for my phone.
Got my Lima, can't wait to put it to use!
Got my Lima's the other day, I ordered 2 for myself for the "RAID" capabilities. So far the software seems solid on Windows 8.1 and on my Android 5.1 device. I currently only have one of the devices connected, as I need to get another hard drive. So far I'm impressed with the data flow, data is transferred quicker than I expected. Now I'm looking forward to get Crashplan integration.
I received my bullima and the damage it caused my file system was so severe that I threw up. A lot.
Careful about the NDA if you are serious, and if not, be careful of the conmen running CGC that would likely sue you if they saw a quick buck in it.
I just received my LIEma and it is a piece of junk. I tried to install the software and it gave me a computer virus. I highly recommend Uninstalling the software and throwing the device away as soon as possible!
Starting to test my Lima. Looks promising. Nice packaging and application design. Look forward to test it more deeply in everyday from mobile.
@FS: I second the question... is the file actually located on your Android (as in can you browse to it with a file manager-like app) or do you need to use the Lima app and hope it knows how to choose the correct viewer for the file? As for the "little bonus"... if it is the in-ear headset then it is not all that useful as that in-ear headset is known to significantly increase ear infections. So, it is useful for its wires and connector only (I hope it is at least a 4-contact audio and mic headset or even the cables are pretty useless).
@FS do you have a waiver for the NDA?
Also, can you open files on Android directly? or do you have to use the Lima app to open things?
I just received and set up my Lima. The packaging is high quality and very well done. I'm using the Windows and Android clients, both of which are fairly polished and work well. Like many people have stated on the forum here, I had abandoned the project and considered it outdated. However, now that I've got it up and running, I'm impressed overall. I'll definitely give it a serious try.
I have the two-pack and will report back on how a second Lima works once I've set up the second device.
I'm not sure if it's been mentioned, but the package contains a nice little bonus.
Just received my Lima. Can't wait to set it up and try it out.
Consolidated List of People Wanting A Lima device Refund
*Add Your Name If You Want Your Money Back*
Please copy-and-paste this list, including the header above, and this preamble, and add your Kickstarter username to the top of the numbered section.
Over the months, many people in these forums have publicly requested a refund from CGC Team ie. Severin Marcombes (CEO) and Gawen Arab-Laffon (CTO).
These requests have been easy to miss, because there are thousands of comments.
Also, whenever someone Googles this product, or its originators, this list appears in the search results. A case of "reaping what you sow".
62. Tadeu Bento (https://www.kickstarter.com/profile/tcb13)
61. Shichimi (added due to comment)
60. Maoz Maroody (added due to comment)
59. BAPTISTE Jean-Christophe (added due to comment)
58. Michael Hofer (added due to comment)
57. Bereth Galicia Cetina
56. Mirko Maurice (http://goo.gl/63oiNv)
55. VW (http://goo.gl/woHfI5)
54. Steve Munro (http://goo.gl/RIIpjQ)
53. Afonso Luciano (http://goo.gl/kAXHQo)
51. Ariel Wiznia
50. hans wurst
49. BRANDON JOHNSON
48. Robert Gauck
47. Scott O Clark (added due to comment)
46. Baskaran Gupta (added due to comment http://goo.gl/IFAHDD)
45. works (added due to comment http://goo.gl/qnURME)
44. QF (added due to comment http://goo.gl/21kUxF)
43. Fred Raguillat (added due to comment http://goo.gl/Rkgpi9)
42. Bogdan Stanciu
41. Mike Gunderloy
39. Colin de Mello
38. SinNYC (Refund request emailed & ignored)
37. fmotta (added by comments)
36. Nicolas Morell (added due to comment)
35. Justin Bean
34. Joey Smith
33. Charles Engen
32. Amy Daley
31. Mehmet Acr
30. Andreas Dahl-Hansen
29. Gabriel de la Pena (http://goo.gl/hTHA3S)
28. Daniel Arevalo
27. Francisco Dianderas
26. Adam Doig (added by request)
25. Benjamin Eick
24. Charles-etienne jamme
23. Siqi Damien Liu
22. Daniel Wolpert(added due to request for refund)
21. Jason Bond (added due to request for refund)
20. Casey Allen
18. Michael Reiter
15. Brian Carter
14. Kjell Provost
13. Keith Anderson
12. Dongjin Kim
10. Brandon Williams
9. Ian R
7. Chris Lewis
3. Ozymandias (already managed to get shipping refunded)
2. Max Metz
1. Rey Espinueva
really happy with my Lima! Arrived today, easy to set up and so far works like I want it to.
Lima arrived and already does its work. I wonder if setting up the second unit is already supported.
@ozymandias: "@clemens -- I am not paying another dime for this piece of shit -- in fact, I am leaving as soon as I get the refund owed me."
PREACH IT, BROTHER!
@fmotta: "The most likely use case for my Lima (presuming it arrives at all) is to crack open the case and determine what debug interface I need to replace the firmware with my own. Barring the ability to install known software I may set up a VLAN and run the app in a VM with all the debug, profiling, traffic snooping, and diagnostics switches set and step through the code and examine the packet flow with Wireshark. If it connects to any unknown or (user specified) site after registration then it is 100% unsafe."
I am very interested to hear what you find when we eventually (if ever, lol) get our non-NDA'd units.
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
I don't care if Lima turns out to be the greatest device since the Walkman; I want my damn money back.
CGC, refund my money in full and I will never post here or anywhere else about your company or product. Until then...
#Fraud , #Lies , #Delays , #Theft
that is an excellent idea @fmotta, test the devil out of this so that we can see exactly where our data is going, since @CGC cannot give proper source code for a third party to scan over to make sure our data is actually secure, the word of @CGC is so far #Lies, #Denial, #Delays, and of course being #Cons. Once I get this device, like around 2018 December, because we know CGC will be delaying more and more as they continue to lie about how they were ready with the code after two years of working on a python code or whatever. Not impressed so far by beta backers responses, not truthful except for 1 person. our of 1000 beta testers (and I think that number is greatly exaggerated).
@sandip, the support team is aware of your problem and is looking into it. More news on that tomorrow by email.
The most likely use case for my Lima (presuming it arrives at all) is to crack open the case and determine what debug interface I need to replace the firmware with my own. Barring the ability to install known software I may set up a VLAN and run the app in a VM with all the debug, profiling, traffic snooping, and diagnostics switches set and step through the code and examine the packet flow with Wireshark. If it connects to any unknown or (user specified) site after registration then it is 100% unsafe.
@sandip get used to it. They regularly ignore backer emails for months at a time.
@clemens -- I am not paying another dime for this piece of shit -- in fact, I am leaving as soon as I get the refund owed me.
Thanks for clarifying those points. Not sure where my Lima is, i received a shipping notification 8 days ago, and no response from Team Lima either..
I registered for the beta and haven't received it. When i will be receiving it. 2 years for a device. Oh god pls
@Mehmet Acr, @Christian Hresko or any other person wanting to sell their unopened Lima (I guess we'll be seeing a lot of them in the near future)... Do you have the keys for activating the software and can you supply them to whoever would buy?
That could be good for anyone (@KC @fmotta @ozy) wanting to test the traffic or software without having to sign a NDA :)
By the way, those comments about finally receiving your Lima do not tell or help in any manner it s just Bull$h**! Is that the only way to get a prolonged warranty for you from CGC? Or what makes you want to post such irrelevant info? Did you also installiert the software? for real?!? but you can not say if all the functions which were promised in the original campaign are working? Now THAT would really be relevant information. Oh, the functions are not implemented... I see... Oh, totally different functions we did not ask for are implemented... I don't see why... Oh, you are not allowed to... I see... how pathetic!
Software is either coded good and can be openly reviewed OR it is trash... but even if it were coded not that good but with good intentions then it should be reviewed by all who can help to make it better (see e.g. github)... Not showing the code means it was coded really bad and the coder wants to hide this fact or that is was coded with bad intentions (then don't install it!)...
So @CGC when is the independent (as of money or friends or NDA) code review?
So your options are to make your router insecure (upnp,) or make your file syncing insecure (AWS/man in middle)
I don't care if Lima turns out to be the greatest device since the Walkman; I want my damn money back.
@ozy: BTW: I too want independent or (Better yet) open source review of the code in Lima before it goes into my network. Having some unverified application opening arbitrary ports without my knowledge is NOT an option (and it should not be an option for ANYONE). Naming the ports used and providing instructions on opening them is the SOLE honest solution.
With UPnP NAT traversal is a risk that has yet to be closed. If I remember correctly... NAT traversal can be abused in a hairpinning manner to gain access to devices on your network.
@ozy: I am uncertain if I see a man-in-the-middle WRT to the implementation (except for maybe some VPN 'clearing house') from the P2P VPN implementation described. I do not see a complete enough representation of the implementation to be certain. P2P (point-to-point) VPN is generally what is used by many companies with multiple sites. As for the 'per-user' key... I am uncertain how it is generated nor exchanged. So, that could be a breakdown in security if it is not also done P2P. If the key is not exchanged 'safely' then it can be used to open up your data. As for UPnP: Well - that is a huge security hole and should never be visible outside a firewall EVER!
@CGC why are you man-in-the-middling your customers? The default behavior should be 100% what was described in the project. You should not be a) secretly sending traffic through third party servers, b) advising people to turn on UPnP -- you should be providing correct, secure documentation to enable the ports needed c) since you have repeatedly shown you cannot be trusted, when will the independent code audit be conducted?
Lima arrived and working well!
I'm selling mine for $60 + shipping. Is there anybody accept that offer here ?
@hc, Lima devices do not "talk through the Amazon Cloud". They establish a VPN and use it to talk to one another. In most cases, this VPN uses direct connection between devices (P2P). When no direct link is available (for instance: devices are behind NATs with no UPnP / open ports), as a fallback, the encrypted trafic is routed through relay nodes (proxies that are hosted on AWS) we provide to ensure your Lima can work properly. This traffic is encrypted end-to-end with SSL, with a per-user key we do not have access to, so even then we cannot access your data.
To the few users confronted to this issue, you have to go in the admin interface of your router and active UPnP. Once that's done, UPnP will open a secure port allowing your devices to communicate directly with each other through VPN.
If you have more question on how to do this, do not hesitate to send it to firstname.lastname@example.org and they'll help you out on this (They try to answer as fast as possible, but for trickier questions such as yours, it might take a bit longer than the average 8 hours as they have to ask developers)
Didn't received any answer from support for my question: Why does the Lima itself, and the software are only talking throug the Amazon Cloud, and not directly with another?
They should do - as promised - a vpn connection to each other.
BOTH, THE LIMA AND THE SOFTWARE ARE SENDING AND RECEIVING ALL DATA INTO AND FROM THE AMAZON CLOUD. WHY? And will this unsecure
Thats not what I have backed for!
Will you change this untraceable behaviour of unsecure communication?
My Lima arrived. I haven't opened it and there seems to be a *few* people left who actually want one. I'm selling mine for $70 + shipping.
@CGC: Send me a refund so I can stop waiting for the inevitable fail from lack or delivery or lack of functionality/security/reliability/... I expect.
@CGC luckily, you *HAVE* tested giving refunds! I was able to get a refund for the shipping portion of my pledge!
Now all we need to do is scale up the refunding, and grant a FULL refund!
Isn't it exciting to be almost done?
@Claes, we have not tested Lima with all the HDDs yet, it should be compatible with this one.
Don't forget to post updates to KICKSTARTER, reply to EMAILS and SEND REFUNDS.....
@everyone, do not forget to take a look at our latest weekly update to be aware of everything we've done in the past week: https://goo.gl/wiuvQm !
@Travis, could you please send an email to email@example.com so that they can help you manage your issue?
@Sandip, this is the magic of Lima, the files you see in your filesystem are not necessarily saved locally. So, you are indeed able to stream all of your content from any device, wherever you are.
@Mark @Fabio @darin @Austin @I&R @Vincent and everyone giving their feedback and keeping the other backers informed on shipping: warm thanks from the team :)
@Sandip: I'm using mine for a similar application and yes, that does work, but as the other commenter stated, at this point you have to wipe the drive clean first
@Sandip: From what I remember (may be wrong) is that Lima lacks the ability to use drives it does not manage from the start (aka it must format it). This may be incorrect, but; I remember asking this before. I have many drives that contain data. It'd be a pain to copy the contents aside and then copy it back onto them via Lima. Also, I have almost No FAT file systems and only a few NTFS. I do not think Lima supports EXT nor HFS and only supports the antiquated file systems like FAT and maybe NTFS.