Share this project

Done

Share this project

Done
Finally a sequel to the award-winning, genre breaking, asymmetric strategy cult classic.  The most sentient AI in gaming.
You can still help us reach more stretch goals!
You can still help us reach more stretch goals!
2,545 backers pledged $97,205 to help bring this project to life.

AI War 2 Early Access: Good News and Bad News

21 likes

Hi there! Both Chris and Keith coming at you, this time. So you know something’s up. ;)

What’s The TLDR?

  • 1. We’re going to delay the actual Early Access launch on Steam until something like late June or early July. Previously it was intended to be May 29th.
  • 2. BUT, for all the “Early Access” level backers from Kickstarter and BackerKit, we’re going to give you your keys on May 29th anyway, as promised.

.

Why The Delay?

Chris: The bottom line is that we don’t want to have a bad first impression on Steam. We’ve done that too many times in past years, to be frank, and we don’t have a solid reason to do that this time. So we decided not to. :)

Keith: The list of units that need to be implemented by the start of Early Access is dwindling rapidly, but not rapidly enough to leave a reasonable time to make the game generally fun to play before making the game generally available.

.

Aren’t You Changing Your Recent Story?

Chris: I’ve been saying, repeatedly with every update, that we seem to be on schedule. That things look good. Etc. But now we’re... delaying?

On the one hand, I think that my statements were pretty justified. In terms of actual feature implementation, we are on schedule and have been on schedule. Hooray, right?

On the other hand: something I failed to take into account was looking beyond the raw features themselves and into the deeper player experience. Is this game fun to play? How many people have been able to really beat on it in a playable state versus a prototype state? And other important questions like that.

Keith: When I started the first of the seven new-unit batches intended to get us ready for Early Access, I told Chris that we were on schedule. At the time we were because it looked like those batches were going to go very quickly. That's not what happened, but until I actually told Chris that my schedule evaluation had changed he didn't know. Translation: my bad, sorry.

.

What Benefits Come Out Of This?

Chris: Having the extra time is beneficial for a number of reasons, mainly in the testing and feedback areas relating to the user experience and gui. That’s more Keith’s area, so I’ll let him speak to that part.

From my end, we’ll be able to have that much more polish visually and aurally when it comes to the initial Early Access launch. Pablo is scheduled to complete a lot of music for the game in June, and that in itself is a big win when it comes to first impressions. We’ll have more of the visual whiz-bang done, and I’ll have more time to make a better trailer and do better screenshots.

This will also give Blue some dedicated time to focus on the GUI with Keith and players. This is one of the chief areas where we feel like we could really have suffered in early Early Access impressions otherwise.

Keith: This delay means we get to playtest the game much more thoroughly before Early Access. This obviously improves the initial impression that phase-launch will make, but also avoids that testing-and-iteration work getting delayed even further because we're putting out fires related to that launch.

We also get more time to work on a UI which doesn't cause Acute Ocular Hemorrhaging (because it won't have been put together by me)

.

Why Include “Early Access” Backers From Kickstarter Early?

Chris: Firstly, this is something that should help the delay be a little more palatable. We’re not trying to annoy anyone with this change in schedule.

Secondly, and much more importantly, we need a larger pool of testers. Our pre-Early-Access testers have done a great job helping us find a variety of problems, and BadgerBadger in particular has been a bughunting fiend. That said, since the game has been in a prototype phase rather than a true “let’s play the game end to end” phase, the enthusiasm for most people to put in a lot of hours is understandably low.

The May 29th date should represent the start of a period where you can play just to play… but there are going to be sharp edges all over the place that you cut yourself on. As a kickstarter backer who hopefully has an extra degree of investment in the concept of this game, you’ll tell us about these things so we can fix them using that extra month+ that we’re taking.

Then when we hit the actual Early Access launch on Steam, it’s a much smoother experience for the non-kickstarter/backerkit folks. That should be good all around, leading to more positive steam reviews and a better ability to accumulate even more feedback to help make things better prior to 1.0.

Keith: All that said, if you opted for an Early Access tier instead of an Alpha tier because you didn't want to play the game until it was at least somewhat polished, it's better to wait to play until later. Having the key early won’t mean you can’t do that; we’ll keep you apprised of development.

.

What’s The Downside?

Chris: From an external perspective, if someone didn’t back the kickstarter, and doesn’t want to via backerkit, they’re now delayed in being able to play the game. From an Arcen standpoint, we’re now delayed in gaining income from Steam and Humble. I’d rather have the long-term goodwill rather than short-term money, but nonetheless it is uncomfortable. Overall, since we’re able to give the Early Access tier backers their keys on the intended date, I think the downsides are blessedly few.

Keith: It means we're not doing what we said we would do, which is never good. That said, we hope you understand why this is the less-bad of the available options.

What Else Comes Out Of This?

Chris: This isn’t truly related to the delay, although the timing is nice. But we had some players on the forums asking about having more voice acting for things like units accepting orders. I’ve started the process of getting those lines written (by me) and performed (by a dozen or so voice actors), and we should now actually have time to get all of those lines in place prior to Early Access. I think it’s something that adds a lot of personality to the game, even though I was resistant to the idea at first. And yes, you can turn them off if you don’t like them. :)

I also just want to add that Keith continues to amaze me with some of the revisions he has been making to various mechanics from AI War Classic. The way that warheads are now handled is the most recent example. These things are super exciting, but since they are new I want to make sure that folks have a chance to actually play with them before we hit that first “public Early Access on Steam” period.

.

How Does This Affect BackerKit?

We have the ability for anyone to preorder the game via backerkit, for that interim period between the kickstarter ending (back in December) and the game becoming available on Steam Early Access. This also allows existing or new backers to select add-ons for extra bonuses for themselves or extra support for us, or both. For those who need to use paypal, we have that too.

The plan on both counts was to disable those on May 29th, when the game hit public Early Access. Since the public Early Access date is being pushed back, we’re going to push the closure date for those two services back as well. We’ll give you advance notice, but basically when the game appears on Steam and Humble, it will disappear off BackerKit and our own paypal link.

Why? Mainly because we can’t indefinitely keep adding user-requested content of the sort that comes with those add-ons. We’re fine for now on that front, but it can’t be an open-ended thing, and the start of the traditional storefronts is a natural closing-off point for this more funding-raising style options.

.

Closing Thoughts

Chris: I do want to apologize for the disruption, even though as kickstarter backers you’re probably used to projects being delayed. It hardly matters what you’re used to; we still try not to do it to you.

At the present time I don’t see this having any negative impact on our plans for a 1.0 launch in October, but I’ve been wrong before, clearly. If something does cause a delay past October for 1.0, we’ll do the same thing as now and get the 1.0 backers their keys on the original timetable rather than whatever the final market timetable morphs into. It’s very much in our best interest to keep to the October schedule if possible, financially-speaking, but we’re also not going to do anything long-term-stupid for short-term gains, if we can help it.

Keith: What he said. And thank y'all very much for your support. Rest assured, the Player Extermination Apparatus will be happy to solve all your "my other games are too easy" problems when the time comes.

Chris: Once again, on behalf of the entire Arcen team, I’d just like to thank everyone who has supported us, and who continues to support us. We wouldn’t be where we are without you, and we’re super excited about how this game is turning out so far.

Alfred Harrigan, Rob Kalbach, and 19 more people like this update.

Comments

Only backers can post comments. Log In
    1. Paul Drager about 8 hours ago

      By all means push the Steam release off into the distance so you don't tank from the get go, but this definitely scares me. Wish you guys would give yourselves more time with your scheduling instead of always moving forward with the tightest possible deadlines.

    2. Chris Park/Arcen Games 2-time creator 4 days ago

      That's a really good way to put it, Patrick.

    3. Missing avatar

      Patrick Pittman 4 days ago

      Please, please, please take your time and do it right. What's a couple of months compared to the years some of us will be playing this game?

    4. Missing avatar

      Curiouser and Curiouser 5 days ago

      I'm glad to see that there is pretty universal agreement that taking more time seems fine by everyone. Though Mario, I don't think describing the AI as "cosy" is a safe thing to do....

    5. Mario Malnar 5 days ago

      Take ure time. We are good. We want it nice and cosy

    6. Missing avatar

      Christian Walker 5 days ago

      Please take your time. While in this day an age 'a bad game (won't) be bad forever', releasing with issues can create a dependence on those issues by players who expect them to be there, and restricts design space in more ways than just looking bad -- such as accruing technical debt on rushed code. Very few in the game development industry take the negative externalities of accelerated development into account.

    7. David Reeves 5 days ago

      As a senior software engineer I would rather you all take your time to get the game right with high quality than rush it out with too many critical/serious defects or missing features just to please a small crowd. A quality product keeps everyone happy and keeps the revenue flowing in so we can have more AI Wars content in the future! Stay the course; we can be patient for something good at the end.

    8. bonuswavepilot 5 days ago

      Software projects are always late, games especially. I think delaying for a better first impression is definitely the smart move to make here.

    9. Missing avatar

      Jamie Mason 5 days ago

      This seems reasonable. It's not a huge delay, and given Arcen's financial history I agree with the need to make a good first impression.

    10. Missing avatar

      Aotrs Commander 5 days ago

      Yeah, ditto. Nothing ever takes the time you think it does, delays are expected. (I'm still waiting for Star Citizen to get its arse in gear and do the damn single-player campaign I signed up for, so a dleay from you guys is nothing...!) The better it is on release, the better for all of us, so take the time you need!

    11. Missing avatar

      Mike Gale 5 days ago

      I'm with Dragondraikk...take as long as you need to not only make it a good game but to make it successful on Steam. More success = more money = more games from Arcen Games = more awesomeness.

    12. Chris Park/Arcen Games 2-time creator 5 days ago

      Thanks for the understanding. :)

    13. Dragondraikk 5 days ago

      I've said it before and I'll say it again: I much prefer to have a game that is delayed but turns out well than one that is on time but clearly needs more time development time (which under other studios it probably would not come, although you guys certainly have a good track record with post-launch releases).

      I'm not discontent with the delay, and let's be honest, pretty much all kickstarter funded games do get delayed at one point or another, so it's not exactly jarring either.