Share this project

Done

Share this project

Done
A nano-satellite that lets you take Earth images and "tweet" from space, then inflates a visible balloon, and de-orbits cleanly.
A nano-satellite that lets you take Earth images and "tweet" from space, then inflates a visible balloon, and de-orbits cleanly.
2,711 backers pledged $116,890 to help bring this project to life.

SkyCube Is Alive

56 likes

All-

SkyCube deployed from the International Space Station last night, at 07:30 GMT -  half an hour before midnight here in California.  These three videos show three different views of the deployment.  They were provided by Nanoracks, courtesy of NASA:

After that, ISS and SkyCube passed into Earth's shadow.  There was a 45 minute wait before the solar panels & radio antennas could deploy. SkyCube had been in cold/dark storage for 4 months, we never tested how the batteries hold charge over that long; they may have discharged; it may take several orbits to recharge up enough to fire up the burnwires that release the solar panels. We just did not know.

This morning, the satellite just made its first North American pass, over New Mexico. We repeatedly sent it "Get telemetry" commands, meaning "send me your battery level, solar panel voltages, overall health level, etc."  For the first minute or two, no response. Then the ground radio started detecting signal at the expected 915 MHz frequency, then a digital signal at the right baud rate. It wasn't quite strong enough to fully decode all the bits, but there was definitely signal coming back. The signal stopped coming back when the satellite crossed over the horizon, as expected. The guys here are sure that was signal from the satellite.

If they're right, this means that the solar panels must have deployed some time last night, and released the radio antennas. And the processor board is working. And the batteries didn't die after 4 months in cold storage.

The patient is alive. Stay tuned.

-Tim

Aubrey, Hens Zimmerman, and 54 more people like this update.

Comments

    1. Creator Tim DeBenedictis on March 7, 2014

      All - we've been really busy trying to identify which of the 5 new TLEs is SkyCube. As of right now, Celestrak's identification of SkyCube = 39569 (i.e., my original guess) is probably not correct. I'll try to post a more complete update in a few more days, including telemetry info. I appreciate your patience here - this is, after all, rocket science.

    2. Creator josep saldaña cavallé on March 6, 2014

      What is the situation right now? Where can we find the details to receive SkyCube telemetry?

    3. Creator Greg Parikh on March 5, 2014

      Satellite Safari just changed the name of 39569 to Skycube, so it may be correct, even with a 1998 designation.

    4. Creator Mauricio Fonseca Beltran on March 5, 2014

      Wait for news... ?

    5. Creator Francisco Eduardo M S Spuny on March 5, 2014

      Me again to Greg : take a look at http://www.n2yo.com/database/…
      I can't fully understand, but NORAD 39569 does not seem to be our SkyCube...

    6. Creator Francisco Eduardo M S Spuny on March 4, 2014

      Dear Greg : I think you are correct. I checked on Satellite Safari and the 39569 seems to be dated to 1998 as you said. Perhaps I looked for the wrong number. I'll be waiting for the next report. Thank you.

    7. Creator Greg Parikh on March 4, 2014

      I don't think it is 39569. That has a date of 1998.

    8. Creator Francisco Eduardo M S Spuny on March 4, 2014

      Just went to Satellite Safari and found it, based on NORAD number 39569. SkyCube will be just over my head (São Paulo, Brazil) in a couple of minutes... Cool... Wish you guys soon receive reliable telemetry data from the Cube.

    9. Creator Mark on March 4, 2014

      Congratulations, any full communication yet?

    10. Creator Tim DeBenedictis on March 3, 2014

      Francisco - on Sunday, celestrak.com published orbits for 5 new objects with NORAD number 39567, 39568, 39569, 39670, 39571. Our best guess, based on position in the deployer, is that SkyCube is 39569. But it's just a guess at this point. We haven't yet had enough contacts to fully disambiguate the objects. They are all still too close together.

    11. Creator Mark Cramer on March 3, 2014

      Way to go!

    12. Creator Francisco Eduardo M S Spuny on March 3, 2014

      I can't see it on Satellite Safari !!! Is it sending signals to earth ? Please, post more news !!!! We all want to know if it is strong and healthy !!!

    13. Creator Thomas Eldredge on March 1, 2014

      Rock on little satellite!

    14. Creator John Kofroth on February 28, 2014

      When will satalite safari know about the orbit?

    15. Creator Alison B. Lowndes on February 28, 2014

      That's so damned awesome.. I've had the longest toughest week but I'm jumping round the room at this news ... so looking forward to the "upload messages" post x PS you guys all rock x!x

    16. Creator Mauricio Fonseca Beltran on February 28, 2014

      Great ! Congratulations !!!
      I am wait for news...

    17. Creator M on February 28, 2014

      Awesome. Congrats guys!

    18. Creator Michael Scott on February 28, 2014

      Wow!!! How Awesome! Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    19. Creator Stephane L. on February 28, 2014

      Congrats! That's a great news!
      I can't wait for the next update

    20. Creator Aubrey on February 28, 2014

      Reading this update had me on the edge of my seat!