Share this project

Done

Share this project

Done
A magazine of all-new swords & sorcery fiction in the classic pulp style!
808 backers pledged $36,820 to help bring this project to life.

Defining Sword-and-Sorcery

18 likes

Defining Sword-and-Sorcery

By Howard Andrew Jones

The term “sword-and-sorcery” gets bandied around a lot. As far as we’re concerned here at The Skull, it’s not just a generic term that can be used interchangeably with fantasy fiction, but a descriptor of a specific sort of fantasy fiction, as intended by Fritz Leiber, the man who coined the phrase. I’ve been working on defining that definition over the years, with a little help from John Hocking, William King, Robert Rhodes, and John “The Gneech” Robey. I see sword-and-sorcery having at least these four characteristics:

The Environment: Sword-and-sorcery fiction takes place in lands different from our own, where technology is relatively primitive, allowing the protagonists to overcome their martial obstacles face-to-face. Magic works, but seldom at the behest of the heroes. More often sorcery is just one more obstacle used against them and is usually wielded by villains or monsters. The landscape is exotic; either a different world, or far corners of our own.

The Protagonists: The heroes live by their cunning or brawn, frequently both. They are usually strangers or outcasts, rebels imposing their own justice on the wilds or the strange and decadent civilizations which they encounter. They are usually commoners or barbarians; should they hail from the higher ranks of society then they are discredited, disinherited, or come from the lower ranks of nobility (the lowest of the high).

Obstacles: Sword-and-sorcery’s protagonists must best fantastic dangers, monstrous horrors, and dark sorcery to earn riches, astonishing treasure, the love of dazzling members of the opposite sex, or the right to live another day.

Structure: Sword-and-sorcery is usually crafted with traditional structure. Stream-of-consciousness, slice-of-life, or any sort of experimental narrative effects, when they appear, are methods used to advance the plot, rather than ends in themselves. A tale of sword-and-sorcery has a beginning, middle, and end; a problem and solution; a climax and resolution. Most important of all, sword-and-sorcery moves at a headlong pace and overflows with action and thrilling adventure.

The protagonists in sword-and-sorcery fiction are most often thieves, mercenaries, or barbarians struggling not for worlds or kingdoms, but for their own gain or mere survival. They are rebels against authority, skeptical of civilization and its rulers and adherents. While the strengths and skills of sword-and-sorcery heroes are romanticized, their exploits take place on a very different stage from one where lovely princesses, dashing nobles, and prophesied saviors are cast as the leads. Sword-and-sorcery heroes face more immediate problems than those of questing kings. They are cousins of the lone gunslingers of American westerns and the wandering samurai of Japanese folklore, traveling through the wilderness to right wrongs or simply to earn food, shelter, and coin. Unknown or hazardous lands are an essential ingredient of the genre, and if its protagonists should chance upon inhabited lands, they are often strangers to either the culture or civilization itself. 

Sword-and-sorcery distances itself further from high or epic fantasy by adopting a gritty, realistic tone that creates an intense, often grim, sense of realism seemingly at odds with a fantasy setting. This vein of hardboiled realism casts the genre’s fantastic elements in an entirely new light, while rendering characters and conflict in a much more immediate fashion. Sword-and-sorcery at times veers into dark, fatalistic territory reminiscent of the grimmer examples of noir-crime fiction. This takes the fantasy genre, the most popular examples of which might be characterized as bucolic fairy tales with pre-ordained happy endings, and transposes a bleak, essentially urban style upon it with often startling effect. While sword-and-sorcery is a relative to high fantasy, it is a different animal. High fantasy, mostly invented by William Morris as an echo of Sir Thomas Mallory and then popularized by J.R.R. Tolkien, moves for the most part at a slow, stately, pace, meandering gently from plot point to plot point, or, as is often the case, from location to location.  

While exotic landscape is present, even common, in sword-and-sorcery, it is displayed differently and toward a different effect. Sword-and-sorcery was birthed in an entirely different tradition. Robert E. Howard, its creator, wrote for the pulps. The pulp magazines, the television of their day, were fueled by quick moving action. The stories needed to grab you within the first few sentences so that if you were browsing the magazine at the news stand you’d feel compelled to purchase it to finish. The pulp stories were meant to seize your attention from the opening lines and never let go.

This difference in pacing is crucial and there are hidden difficulties attendant in trying to create it on the page. John Chris Hocking added this to the discussion: “Some sword-and-sorcery authors seem to believe that swift pacing must equal Action. And that Action must equal Violence. Neither of these things are true. All the fighting and running and frenzy you create will grow tiresome unless it is moving the story forward. Sure, Action is great unto itself, but it is the unfolding of the plot that truly captivates.”

Todd Stephens, James Schmidt, and 16 more people like this update.

Comments

Only backers can post comments. Log In
    1. Todd Stephens
      Superbacker
      on

      I totally agree on Solomon Kane. I think what I like most about him is his near total lack of personal motivation. Why does he do what he does? If one were to ask him why he fights evil, he would shrug and say, "Because evil exists". Why does the mountain climber climb the mountain? Because it's there.

    2. Howard A. Jones Collaborator on

      Solomon Kane's one of my favorites, but Conan is probably my absolute favorite, followed very closely by Corwin of Amber, and then Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, and Leigh Brackett's Stark... and of course Harold Lamb's Khlit the Cossack. But he's more of a first cousin to sword-and-sorcery, since he's kind of a precursor character.

    3. JediOre on

      Well, since no one has commented on this insightful essay so far, I will.
      When looking over the material that encompasses Sword and Sorcery, their is one character I find I identify with more than any other. For many of Goodman Game fans, this selection will seem odd, but to my friends, and perhaps to those who remember Harley and my back and forth on evil PCs in a game thread on the Goodman Game forums (goodness that was years ago), it will be in keeping with who I am: I love to read Howard's Solomon Kane's stories. He is who I most identify with. :)
      Anyone else have a particular character that they identify with?