Project image
pledged of $50,000pledged of $50,000 goal
0seconds to go
Funding Unsuccessful
The project's funding goal was not reached on Thu, April 18 2013 9:43 PM UTC +00:00
pledged of $50,000pledged of $50,000 goal
0seconds to go
Funding Unsuccessful
The project's funding goal was not reached on Thu, April 18 2013 9:43 PM UTC +00:00

Loose Ends - Answering Questions!

Posted by Studio Fawn (Creator)
Hey everyone! We are headed into the final week of the campaign! Thanks so much for the support so far. A week is a pretty long time; with an extra push we can still definitely make the goal. I encourage everyone to message their favorite websites, news sources, forums, or even just telling a friend or two to spread awareness about the project.

It should be pretty obvious by now that we are really going the extra mile with the game in art, music, game design, and story. Though at the end of the day these things are really just a result of our passion and dedication to making a game that we think everyone will really enjoy. To all the pledgers (or even those just helping to reach more people but haven’t donated) thank you so much for supporting us in what we are trying to do.

Anyhow, onto the update!

For this update, I thought it would be a good idea to just tie up a lot of loose ends and try to address some questions I've been getting about the project. I've also been answering a bunch of questions through a couple interviews that you can all check out as well (so, I’ll try not to cover the same things here).

Now to answer a couple more specific questions.

What’s the deal with platforms??

Basically the situation with the platforms is this. For the initial release (day 1), we plan to release the game on PC and Mac (simply because distributing on steam and giving downloadable links is the easiest and lowest cost for us).

After that, we plan to continue forward with additional platform support (eventually hitting all of the major platforms from Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony, Android ~Ouya~, and Linux). This isn't the type of game that can be played on a phone, but a tablet version should be doable and something we have yet to explore (since the way we are making the game is very flexible and light, pretty sure it will be ok). We have actually already begun chatting with Microsoft and Sony, so as we move forward we will be lining everything up to get out to additional platforms as soon as possible.

So you said there are choices in the game, is this through dialogue trees? You hinted at doing things different?

Our philosophy is we want people playing the game, not reading the game. You could say words are all talk, action speaks volumes. To this end, we want to give players different options in how they approach situations. We also want the different types of actions to have their own challenges and rewards (or consequences).

So, let’s take an example of a big brutish creature that you might run across. When you try to get near, it attacks you.

1)   So first instinct would be to simply attack back and try to dominate it. We know players are probably thinking that, so we make that option harder (sometimes, really hard). Chances are if you are playing the game for the action and combat you probably will appreciate more of a fight (this organically lets the game match your play style). It could be through the creatures difficulty itself, or we could throw a curve ball at you and make the creatures death trigger a story-driven battle down the road in another part of the game.

2)   Instead of attacking, you could jump into the bridge and look around (the bridge allows you to observe things that might not be obvious normally). Here you might be able to communicate with the “true self” of the creature, or gain insight into what it is feeling / thinking. This isn't a branching dialogue, but more a way to try and feel out what the deal is with the creature. Of course, doing this doesn't always just give you what you are expecting and can trigger its own challenges or pose a puzzle you need to get past. Either way, these are typically non-combat and involve more problem solving / exploration.

3)   Leave it alone. Yup, this is an option (and one just as viable as the rest). We want to surprise and reward players for doing things a little counter-intuitively (at least by the standards of most games). Avoiding conflict and allowing things to live when you don’t have a reason to kill them might pay off down the road. If the creature is blocking your path, just run past him. Examples of ways we would treat this is the creature appearing in a helpful way later on, or it could trigger some event.

Basically, we are approaching things less as “just a game” and more as a world you are experiencing. “Game logic” isn't the logic we go by. When you run across a creature, your instinct should be to wonder what is going to happen. ..who this creature is. ..what kinds of twists and turns it will send you down. It shouldn't be a calculated “dead creature = more exp and gold”, but instead a cautious experience in discovery.

Of course, there are still a good amount of “kill it kill it” type of game play. Always being on your toes and unknowingly at the mercy of the game design would make you feel a tad paranoid (some is ok, but too much can just get to be a bit bananas). So, the world will still have its lifeless automatons you can run around bashing to your hearts content.

But, also, there will typically be a lot around you to discover (if you choose to pull on these dangling strings of unknown adventure). That is why when I say a lot of the game is “optional”, it is because we aren't forcing these things on you. If you see a trail leading into a cave away from where you are headed, yea you can just keep going and skip it; but, well, as a gamer I know if the game is fun and keeping me interested I’ll probably explore that cave (if the game is boring and a chore and I know I’ll only find exp, gold, and maybe a slightly unusual item for a ton of work, I’ll skip it).

Hopefully this clears up a little bit more of how we are approaching things and gives a little insight into how we want this to be an interactive experience.

Thanks again for all the support! One week left, we can do it!! :)


Only backers can post comments. Log In
    1. Dave, Shadowrunner on

      Just wondering.. This update mentions Steam and also downloadable links (which I'm assuming is a separate DRM-free version) being offered. Will backers choose which distribution method we want or be given access to both a Steam key and the direct download?

      Part of the reason I ask is because the creators of Shadowrun Returns recently had quite a bit of controversy when announcing the differences between their Steam version and a DRM version promised to backers...

      I'm also not really sure how I feel about Steam (never used it because I avoid DRM) and would probably prefer a non-Steam version.

    2. Studio Fawn 3-time creator on

      Yea, you are right. I'll add in a link to the explanation of additional platforms. Thanks Jay :)

    3. Jay Cassano on

      I just want to say that if you *definitely* plan on supporting Linux, even if it's not on Day 1, then you should advertise that more up front. I'd guess that a lot of Linux gamers passed over Bloom because it didn't sound like there was guaranteed to be a Linux version. The Humble Indie Bundle and Steam for Linux have shown that the Linux gaming population is a segment that does contribute a decent portion of money to projects. So that might be something to consider going forward into your next Kickstarter attempt.