Surprised to find the comments section empty of PCH currency suggestions this morning, so just to kick things off (and make sure I've understood the directions):

"PCHousepoints"

Great to see the development being discussed/roadmap. Exciting. Few questions:
Was fish-slapping episode 0?
What's the current intended start date/month for Episode 1 development?

Depending on your marketing plans, 3 week intervals could give some random dates if the releases aren't held up. Might be nicer to have the community looking for the next update on a set day of each month? Not major - just saying.

The board designs and larger artwork requirements could have thumbnails in the text boxes so when you click on them you get a larger image that fills the browser window and allows you to zoom in. Or you could link a png thumbnail to a SketchUp 3D figure, or a video on youtube, or a slideshow on flickr, etc.
-
As for scalability it shouldn't be a problem if you only show the text boxes linked to the one you've highlighted. For example, if you've clicked on a box in the middle of the thread it shows you the box it links from and the column it links to, all other text boxes disappear because they're not relevant. You can scroll up and down the next column to read all the entries and when you select one all the other boxes disappear and then it shows you all of the boxes linked to that one in the next column. This method will let you focus on the thread that looks most interesting to you while showing you all of the options to come. Does this make sense or would you like me to illustrate it like I did the main idea? I know how this should work, and I kind of know how it should be programmed, but I'm just too much of a Javascript n00b to code it.
-
As for dozens of people leaving comments, that's the strength of this system, it's adaptable to any number of input and divergences. Let's say there's a game idea that's already ten steps into the design and you, as the moderator, post that everything looks good so far but how should the game handle combat. Any number from one to one thousand can post their ideas immediately linked after your request. You and anyone else interested in this game thread can scroll through them all, voting on which ideas you like, don't like or are ambivalent to. After a while you and your fellow programmers can check out the top ten combat ideas, highlight the one or more you find most promising, leave notes like "Too random" or "Too complex" and let the crowd follow up with more suggestions to answer your comments. Since they're just text boxes it should be easy to store server-side. It's like a regular forum but structured differently.
-
You could also program the web site so the administrators can select the boxes in a thread and move them to their own page. This would be your way of saying "We like this game idea, let's focus on it." You could also delete dead threads that aren't seeing any action, or posts that are badly made, don't offer anything to the thread, or are at the bottom of the list.
-
Hope this helps.

Congrats on getting funded! W00t!
-
Crowdsourcing: I tried to make an interactive demo page in HTML5, but I'm still learning Javascript and can't get the interactivity to run right, so I made a static page to explain the idea. I think this will be more understandable than plain text typed up here:
http://palenoue.businesscatalyst.com/index.html
-
Good points on board games. You'd want to cover all your bases here because there will be groups of friends who want to play at the same time (like we do twice a week for World of Warcraft), friends who want to play with asynchronous push notification, individuals who want two or more AI opponents, etc. This does require a lot of programming, but once you get it down it will be easier to make more board games in the future.

Glad you're open to member game suggestions. Too many places brag about being different, only to produce nothing but clones while ignoring truly good ideas in their player forums. I hate that, it's so frustrating. Do you have a forum where we could discuss crowdsourcing methods? I've researched various methods but this isn't the place to list out a lot of text on the subject ;-)
.
So if multiplayer games are 4x to 10x the work, but board and card games are simpler, does that even out? ;-)
Seriously though, even if you can't do multiplayer right away I'd still like to see some board and card games because: 1) they're fun, 2) you can play at your own pace, 3) they don't require the lightning-fast twitch reflexes of a 10-year-old chugging energy drinks, which I never had as a kid and sure don't have now that I'm old.
Of course, without multiplayer you'll have to program AI opponents which makes it harder again. Even with multiplayer having AI opponents would be good to round out a game.

Oh, well, I'll just throw money at you, cross my fingers and hope for the best.

Great idea, I look forward to being an active member.

Two questions:

1> Do you think you'll allow members to suggest games in the future? Right now you're only asking our opinion on elements of a game you created, but later on after you've made several games might you allow us members to create a game from scratch? I've given this concept a lot of thought, as I'm very interested in crowdsourcing projects, and I've looked into different ways to facilitate the decision-making process. I believe this is possible and could lead to very interesting and enjoyable games.

2> Are you going to make any multi-player games? While I enjoy solo puzzle games I do wish there were some good board or card games my friends and I could play online. Also, board and card games would allow members more opportunity to contribute. You could say you need ideas/art/sounds for 100 cards and let us go crazy with the puns ;-)